Rugby had always been a huge part of New Zealand’s colonial identity. It was a link to Mother Britain, a strong man’s sport. It encouraged teamwork and strength, two qualities that were useful in New Zealand society. Playing rugby against South Africa was consistent with New Zealand’s traditional identity as a loyal servant of the British Empire. However, the anti-tour movement had a different idea. New Zealand emerged as a different cultural identity, challenging the way it had always been seen, as a little Britain. It could be seen as a role-model society because of the protests: racially tolerant and willing to strive for justice in society.
This challenge of colonial identity was part of the large debate common in New Zealand – how British are we? The Springbok Tour was again not directly responsible for this debate, but seeing that New Zealand could have its own opinions and attempt to change international society for the better meant that New Zealanders could glimpse independence. Not only did the protests gain new Zealanders independence, but a sense of self-worth was discovered when New Zealanders realized that they did matter.
This challenge of colonial identity was part of the large debate common in New Zealand – how British are we? The Springbok Tour was again not directly responsible for this debate, but seeing that New Zealand could have its own opinions and attempt to change international society for the better meant that New Zealanders could glimpse independence. Not only did the protests gain new Zealanders independence, but a sense of self-worth was discovered when New Zealanders realized that they did matter.